Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead.winter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead.winter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The general notability guideline states "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article" - I can find no evidence of such coverage for this topic. The only third party coverage I can find is from unreliable sources including blogs (e.g. [1], [2], [3]), forums and other webcomics as well as a smattering of other trivial coverage. The article is currently comprised almost entirely of plot detail and without reliable third party sources it will not be possible to approach the topic from an encyclopaedic perspective, giving the article a historical and critical context. Guest9999 (talk) 18:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability in the form of reliable sources writing about this web comic. -- Whpq (talk) 17:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable webcomic. Google search for "Dead.winter" brings up the webcomic's page, and that's it. ~ Baron Von Yiffington ^. _talk ^. _contribs 12:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Absolute delete. No third-party coverage. Just get rid of this one. — Timneu22 · talk 14:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.